Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Posts
A Yosemite bear

The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (90% of Full)


Advanced

Re: Merced Wild and Scenic River Final Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement released

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

Here's the official announcement of the release of Yosemite National Park's Merced Wild and Scenic River Final Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement:


February 14, 2014

Yosemite National Park Announces the Release of the Merced Wild and Scenic River Final Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
Comprehensive Management Plan will provide access and protect Merced River resources

Yosemite National Park announces the release of the Merced Wild and Scenic River Final Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

“This plan will protect the Merced River and its outstandingly remarkable values into perpetuity and provide quality visitor facilities and access,” stated Don Neubacher, Yosemite Superintendent. “The planning process has been a monumental effort and we appreciate all the public input we have received. We now want to move forward with actions in the Plan that are critical to the preservation and enjoyment of this iconic national treasure.”

The Merced River was designated a Wild and Scenic River by the U. S. Congress in 1987 to preserve its free flowing condition, water quality and outstandingly remarkable values. Under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, Yosemite National Park is required to develop a management plan to protect and enhance the 81 miles of the Merced River that are within the park. More than 30,000 comments were received on the draft plan during a formal public comment period, which ran from January 8, 2013 through April 30, 2013.

Public involvement has been a cornerstone of the planning process. Throughout plan development, the park conducted more than 60 public meetings, both in the park, and throughout the state. The park also conducted several webinars to help people understand some of the more complex elements of the plan so they could provide informed comments. Many of the changes between the draft and final plan were the direct result of concerns raised during public meetings, agency and tribal consultation, and in public comments.

“We spent thousands of hours reading and responding to comments to make sure we understood everyone’s concerns. The preferred alternative was modified to accommodate many of the changes requested during the public review,” stated Kathleen Morse, Yosemite Chief of Planning. “This final plan integrates the ideas of a passionate public with proven stewardship practices and the best available science to create a powerful vision for the future of the Merced River and Yosemite Valley.”

The final preferred alternative (Alternative 5: Enhanced Visitor Experience and Essential Riverbank Restoration) is based on guiding principles that include restoring natural conditions to riparian areas, riverbanks and meadows, modifying the transportation system to provide a better visitor experience in Yosemite Valley, enhancing recreational opportunities, and reducing or eliminating unnecessary facilities and services in the river corridor.

Under the selected alternative, visitors to Yosemite Valley will see marked improvements in the transportation system, including more efficient parking and traffic flow. Coupled with enhancements to meadows, improvements to river access, and extensive riverbank restoration, the visitor experience will be significantly improved. Visitors to Yosemite Village will experience an enhanced “sense of arrival” to the heart of Yosemite Valley, as the plan fully integrates the primary day-use parking area with pathways to visitor services, restrooms, and food service.

The selected alternative will protect and enhance river values through essential ecological restoration of riverbanks and riparian and meadow habitat. Abandoned infrastructure within the bed and banks of the river will be removed, along with campsites and associated infrastructure within 100 feet of the river; these areas will be ecologically restored. This alternative will also establish a valley oak habitat protection area in El Portal. Further study will be conducted to assess the alluvial processes of the Merced River and develop a strategy for addressing the hydraulic constriction associated with the historic Sugar Pine Bridge. The connection between meadows and the riparian floodplain throughout the Valley will be enhanced with engineering and design treatments, including the installation of large box culverts and permeable subgrades to improve surface water flow.

Recreational activities, such as rafting, bicycling, and ice skating will continue, with rental facilities and services provided at locations outside of the river corridor. With watercraft allowed on eight miles of the Merced River in Yosemite Valley, boaters will be able to float new and challenging reaches of water framed by views of El Capitan and Half Dome. Valley stables will be active, servicing the High Sierra camp and supporting NPS administrative activities. Private horseback riding and boarding will continue in Yosemite Valley and further into the high country.

Families will enjoy expanded camping opportunities in East Yosemite Valley, with new walk-in campsites provided east of Camp 4, at Upper Pines, and at the location of the former Upper and Lower River campgrounds. More drive-in campsites (including some RV sites) will be provided in new camping areas at Upper Pines and Lower River (adjacent to the road) and at El Portal. Housekeeping Camp will continue to offer an alternative to camping, with improved access to the nearby beach and picnicking area.

The visual distraction caused by substandard temporary housing at Curry Village will be eliminated. Similar improvements will be noticed at Yosemite Lodge, with the replacement of temporary modular housing with permanent, rustically designed, current code-compliant housing. Redundant services, such as the Village Sports Shop, the Lodge Nature Shop, and the Yosemite Lodge post office will be eliminated and replaced with visitor information and interpretive functions. Overall, the visitor will discover a less cluttered and confused Yosemite Valley experience with ample opportunity to enjoy the river and its values without diminishing their quality.

West Yosemite Valley will retain its overall natural character with limited facilities and services provided. This peaceful setting will continue to serve as a destination for low-impact recreational activities such as hiking, rock climbing, photography, and wildlife viewing.

Backcountry enthusiasts traveling through the Merced River corridor will find designated camping at Little Yosemite Valley, Moraine Dome, and Merced Lake. Visitors to Yosemite Wilderness will have the option of staying at a smaller Merced Lake High Sierra camp and continuing on to other High Sierra Camps or exiting to the Valley.

Visitors to Wawona will continue to enjoy the historic Hotel, swimming pool and tennis courts. Recreational activities will include camping, commercial horseback day rides from the Wawona stables, golfing, swimming, picnicking, and boating the South Fork Merced.

Specific highlights of the Final Merced River Plan include:

Protecting the Merced River’s Health and Other Resources
  • Restoring 189 acres, mostly in meadows and riparian areas. This includes the removal of 6,048 linear feet of riprap (stones and cement in and near riverbeds used for stabilization).
  • Improving meadow hydrology by removing artificial fill, filling ditches, and adding culverts.
  • Planting native vegetation to stabilize riverbanks and improve scenic views along the river.
  • Retaining the historic bridges.
  • Implementing the Scenic Vista Management Plan to protect views from historic vista points.
  • Removing informal trails, non-essential roads, and infrastructure causing impacts to archeological sites.
  • Retaining and preserving the Awahnee Hotel, Wawona Hotel, Wawona Covered Bridge, LeConte Memorial Lodge, Merced Lake High Sierra Camp, and other historically significant properties.
Preserving and Enhancing Recreational Opportunities
  • Camping will be increased by 37% in Yosemite Valley. This includes building 72 sites in the location of the former Upper and Lower River Campgrounds, 35 walk-in sites east of Camp 4, and 87 sites at the existing Upper Pines Campground. An additional 40 drive-in campsites will be provided at the Trailer Park Village in El Portal.
  • The ice skating rink in Curry Village will be moved to its historical 1928 location outside of the river corridor.
  • Lodging will be increased slightly corridorwide (3%) and in Yosemite Valley (5%).
  • Bicycle and raft rentals will remain available in the park, with rental facilities located outside of the river corridor.
  • Picnic and day-use opportunities will be improved and expanded at Yosemite Village, Church Bowl, and Happy Isles.
  • Wawona stables services will be expanded.
Improving Transportation System
  • Additional shuttle bus service in Yosemite Valley will alleviate private vehicle congestion.
  • Regional transit to the park will be expanded.
  • Park roads will be rerouted to improve traffic flow and visitor safety by reducing vehicle-pedestrian conflicts.
  • Significant changes to traffic circulation patterns will be made to meet ecological restoration goals and reduce traffic congestion.
  • There will be an 8% increase in parking for day use visitors to Yosemite Valley. This increase includes a new 300-car parking lot located in El Portal with shuttle service to the Valley.
Managing Visitor Use to Ensure High Quality Visitor Experience
  • Marked improvements in parking availability, traffic flow, and signage, along with the removal of administrative and industrial facilities will give visitors an enhanced “sense of arrival” to Yosemite Village and the heart of Yosemite Valley.
  • Visitation levels will be similar to those seen over the past several years. A user capacity of 18,710 people at one time will be established for Yosemite Valley, which will accommodate a peak visitation of approximately 21,100 visitors per day.
  • User capacity for East Yosemite Valley will be managed using advanced monitoring and communication systems and rerouting traffic at the El Capitan Traffic Diversion prior to reaching established limits.
  • Overnight-use capacity will be managed through wilderness permits and reservation systems for lodging and camping.
The Final Merced River Plan/EIS presents and analyzes six alternatives. Alternative 1 (No Action) would have continued current management and trends in the condition of river values. Alternatives 2, 3, 4, and 6 would have protected and enhanced river values by improving conditions that threaten sensitive meadows, archeological resources, and scenic vistas. The action alternatives varied primarily with regard to the degree of restoration proposed and the amount of visitor use that would be accommodated.

For a copy of the complete five-volume Plan and EIS (approximately 3,000 pages), please visit the park’s website at www.nps.gov/yose/parkmgmt/mrp.htm or http://parkplanning.nps.gov/mrp_feis.

A public meeting will be conducted to provide information about the final plan. The meeting will be held on Thursday, March 6, 2014, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. in the Yosemite Valley Auditorium. The public meeting will also be available via webinar at http://yose.webex.com.

After a 30-day no-action period, the plan will be finalized and a Record of Decision will be prepared and signed.


From the Executive Summary of the Merced River Plan Final EIS, here is a list of the major changes between the draft EIS preferred alternative (Alternative 5) and the final EIS preferred alternative (Alternative 5):


SUMMARY OF CHANGES BETWEEN DRAFT AND FINAL PLAN

The Final Merced River Plan/EIS has been shaped by coordination and consultation with members of the public, traditionally associated American Indian tribes and groups, agency partners, and other stakeholders. Many of the changes between the draft and final plans were the direct result of comments raised during public meetings or consultation efforts. This collaboration has produced a final plan that will improve visitor experience and better protect the Merced River’s unique values.
Alternative 5 (Preferred), as presented in the Final Merced River Plan/EIS, includes several changes made in response to public comment and consultation. New development previously proposed for West Yosemite Valley has been eliminated, bicycle and raft rentals are relocated rather than removed, and proposed changes to lodging at Curry Village have been revised to better preserve historic resources. The primary changes to the draft preferred alternative are as follows:
  • Increase the number of campsites proposed for Upper and Lower River Campgrounds to provide a total of 72 sites (60 walk-in, 10 auto sites, and two group sites).
  • Increase total number of lodging units at Curry Village to 482 to account for units recently relocated from the rock-fall hazard zone.
  • Relocate the Curry Village ice skating rink from within the river corridor to its original 1929 location at the south end of the Curry Overnight Parking area.
  • Retain bicycle rentals in Yosemite Valley by moving the Curry Village and Yosemite Lodge rental facilities to locations outside of the river corridor.
  • Provide raft rentals at a location outside of the river corridor.
  • Eliminate the 100 parking spaces originally proposed for West Valley and increase the size of the El Portal Remote Parking Area to 300 spaces. Provide shuttle service from the El Portal parking lot to Yosemite Valley.
  • Eliminate the Eagle Creek Campground originally proposed for West Valley.
  • Eliminate the proposed 164-bed dormitory at the Huff House temporary employee housing area; retain the historic Huff House and 10 canvas tent cabins; add employee housing to locations outside the river corridor in Yosemite Valley and El Portal.
  • Reduce the size of the Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area to provide 750 parking spaces (from the 850 originally proposed) and provide 189 day-use parking spaces at the Curry Village Day-use Parking Area (the site of Huff House temporary employee housing).
  • Retain Sugar Pine Bridge. Conduct further hydrologic impact study to determine the effects of the bridge on the river’s alluvial nature. Consideration of bridge removal would involve tiered NEPA compliance and Section 106 Consultation.
  • Remove Superintendent’s House (Residence 1) and Garage.
  • Retain the Ahwahnee and Yosemite Lodge swimming pools.
  • Retain 50 historic canvas tents and 14 non-historic cabin-without-bath units at Boys Town and construct 52 new hard-sided cabin-with-bath units.
  • Retain the Housekeeping Camp Store.

Remove the superintendent's house and the garage? Where will he live and how will they maintain the fleet of vehicles that the park service operates in the park?
The Park's Superintendent hasn't lived in the Superintendent's House since the Great 1997 Flood. So removing it from its present location is a no brainer. But since it's a historic building, I hope they don't destroy it but instead relocate it elsewhere (maybe in Wawona if possible) and restore it.

I've haven't read all of the final EIS yet, so I'm not sure if this bullet point is referring to a garage that was next to the Superintendent's house, or the main NPS garage located in Yosemite Village. If they are referring to the main garage, the services provided by the main garage could be provided by a service garage located in El Portal. But IIRC, the main garage that's located in Yosemite Village was out of the Merced River Plan study zone.

.
Okay, I finished reading the relevant portion of the Merced River Plan.

The garage mentioned in the bullet point you were referring to is indeed the small garage next to the Superintendent's House.

But... The large DNC garage located in Yosemite Village will also be removed. This wasn't mentioned in the bullets points of my second post because the DNC garage was going to be removed in all proposed alternatives, including in all the draft alternatives.

According to the Merced River Plan, the services provided by the DNC garage with now be provided at the Government Utility Building (which is located next to DNC's main warehouse) on the north side of Yosemite Village.

.
Quote
hotrod4x5
Remove the superintendent's house and the garage? Where will he live and how will they maintain the fleet of vehicles that the park service operates in the park?
As you are about to go over that hump of a bridge over Yosemite Creek on North Side Drive, look to the left and you will see the "Superintendent's House" that got damaged in the flood and has not been occupied since. It also has a garage. That is what is being removed. It sits in Superintendent's Meadow.
Quote
Dave
Quote
hotrod4x5
Remove the superintendent's house and the garage? Where will he live and how will they maintain the fleet of vehicles that the park service operates in the park?
As you are about to go over that hump of a bridge over Yosemite Creek on North Side Drive, look to the left and you will see the "Superintendent's House" that got damaged in the flood and has not been occupied since. It also has a garage. That is what is being removed. It sits in Superintendent's Meadow.

I didn't realize that was the house. I thought it was the large home at the intersection of North Side drive and the road to the Ahwahnee.
Quote
hotrod4x5
I didn't realize that was the house. I thought it was the large home at the intersection of North Side drive and the road to the Ahwahnee.
Are you talking about the Camp 6 Intersection? North Side Drive and Village Drive? The building across Village Drive from the DNC offices is building 9000, the Indian Creek Apartments. I'm pretty sure that's DNC housing.
Quote
Dave
Quote
hotrod4x5
I didn't realize that was the house. I thought it was the large home at the intersection of North Side drive and the road to the Ahwahnee.
Are you talking about the Camp 6 Intersection? North Side Drive and Village Drive? The building across Village Drive from the DNC offices is building 9000, the Indian Creek Apartments. I'm pretty sure that's DNC housing.

It doesn't look like apartments, but I could be wrong. It appears to be a single family home, with a fenced yard. If I recall correctly, I only saw one SAT TV dish. It would be the building (or very near) that the Half Dome Cam must be mounted on.

EDIT, It's not exactly at the intersection, but a bit east of it.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/18/2014 09:40AM by hotrod4x5.
Quote
hotrod4x5
Quote
Dave
Quote
hotrod4x5
I didn't realize that was the house. I thought it was the large home at the intersection of North Side drive and the road to the Ahwahnee.
Are you talking about the Camp 6 Intersection? North Side Drive and Village Drive? The building across Village Drive from the DNC offices is building 9000, the Indian Creek Apartments. I'm pretty sure that's DNC housing.

It doesn't look like apartments, but I could be wrong. It appears to be a single family home, with a fenced yard. If I recall correctly, I only saw one SAT TV dish. It would be the building (or very near) that the Half Dome Cam must be mounted on.

EDIT, It's not exactly at the intersection, but a bit east of it.

I know the place you are talking about and I think it might be a single family home. BTW the Ahwahnee Meadow cam is on one of those small houses that are along the edge of Ahwahnee Meadow. It is about midway in that row.
Quote
parklover
Quote
hotrod4x5
Quote
Dave
Quote
hotrod4x5
I didn't realize that was the house. I thought it was the large home at the intersection of North Side drive and the road to the Ahwahnee.
Are you talking about the Camp 6 Intersection? North Side Drive and Village Drive? The building across Village Drive from the DNC offices is building 9000, the Indian Creek Apartments. I'm pretty sure that's DNC housing.

It doesn't look like apartments, but I could be wrong. It appears to be a single family home, with a fenced yard. If I recall correctly, I only saw one SAT TV dish. It would be the building (or very near) that the Half Dome Cam must be mounted on.

EDIT, It's not exactly at the intersection, but a bit east of it.

I know the place you are talking about and I think it might be a single family home. BTW the Ahwahnee Meadow cam is on one of those small houses that are along the edge of Ahwahnee Meadow. It is about midway in that row.

And the house I am referring to is the first in that row. It looks pretty large, I always assumed it belonged to a park service big wig.
Quote
hotrod4x5

And the house I am referring to is the first in that row. It looks pretty large, I always assumed it belonged to a park service big wig.


All of those residences in that complex are for DNC employees, so that home might be the residence of DNC's head honcho for Yosemite.

(Most of the residences on the east side of Yosemite Village are for DNC employees. The few remaining residences for NPS staff are on the westside of Yosemite Village, west of the Yosemite Museum.)

.
Z Ahwahneeee Meadow / Half a Dome Cam:


Soooperintendents Thing-a-ding:

(note z small watafall in da background)



Chick-on is looking at you!
Quote
Dave
Quote
hotrod4x5
Remove the superintendent's house and the garage? Where will he live and how will they maintain the fleet of vehicles that the park service operates in the park?
As you are about to go over that hump of a bridge over Yosemite Creek on North Side Drive, look to the left and you will see the "Superintendent's House" that got damaged in the flood and has not been occupied since. It also has a garage. That is what is being removed. It sits in Superintendent's Meadow.


For those that don't know all the meadow names, Superintendent's Meadow is more commonly known as Cook's Meadow.
Quote
plawrence
Camping will be increased by 37% in Yosemite Valley. This includes building 72 sites in the location of the former Upper and Lower River Campgrounds,

After all the hype about shutting down the River Campgrounds after the flood?
I'm glad they're reopening the River Campgrounds (on a smaller scale) in the new plan. They should have never been shutdown completely in the first place. Properly designed, a campground can be compatible and reside successfully in a known flood plain.

I'm also extremely happy that they nixed in the revised plan the proposed ill-conceived campground by Eagle Creek (which would have been located just east of the El Cap Picnic Area). Overall, I'm very pleased with the final plan that they're planning to adopt.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/14/2014 02:59PM by plawrence.
Could not help noticing expanding capacity of Wawona stable services. Just what we need--more stock on the trails.
But they're removing commercial stock rentals from Yosemite Valley, so there will be less stock going up and down the John Muir Trail. Yeah! smiling smiley

(Note: stock used to resupply the Merced Lake HSC will still be stabled in Yosemite Valley.)

.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login