Quote
y_p_w
DNC also operates Yellowstone General Stores, which the article didn't mention. It's kind of a strange division of concessionaires there, with Xanterra providing all of the lodging and most of the dining with DNC operating the general stores and some of the dining facilities. There must be some story to all that.
Historically, there have been somewhat different lodging/business histories to Yosemite and Yellowstone:
In the 90's legislative mandates changed the awarding of opportunities for the contracts in the national parks.
Yosemite assets and opportunities previously owned by Curry Company were held briefly by MCA (Japanese Company) and due, probably, to public complaint eventually by DNC.
Yosemite Concession History:
http://articles.latimes.com/1991-01-09/news/mn-7227_1_national-park-foundationhttp://www.nytimes.com/1992/12/18/us/us-picks-concessionaire-for-yosemite-park.htmlhttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3190/is_n1_v27/ai_13308516/http://www.yosemite.org/76/Concessioners.htm?expandable=0In
Yellowstone, historically the Yellowstone Park Co managed lodging and Hamilton Stores ran/owned the goods services. Again in the 90's this changed and different contractors prevailed but the division in services has persisted.
Yellowstone Concession History (there has been historically a division between lodging and goods sales in Yellowstone):
Yellowstone Park Co to TW services to AmFac to Xanterra =
http://www.geocities.com/geysrbob/Hotel_History_6_.htmlHamilton Stores =
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton's_Stores_(Yellowstone_National_Park)
In reviewing this, it seems that a large amount of money comes to the park service (one figure was 25% of every dollar spent in the park) from the concessions. What is wrong with that? What are the objections to the current concessioners??
The cure for a fallacious argument is a better argument, not the suppression of ideas.
-- Carl Sagan