Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Posts
Bridalveil Falls, Yosemite National Park

The Moon is Waxing Crescent (38% of Full)


Advanced

Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

avatar Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 04, 2011 08:54PM
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 04, 2011 08:56PM
Quote
eeek
http://www.ske-art.com/skestuff9/B003J9QB52

Those are just really old ones.



Old Dude
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 05, 2011 08:17AM
Quote
mrcondron

Those are just really old ones.

Beside, they are already yellow on the outside. Ton of chemicals keep them that way in perpetuity.
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 05, 2011 08:17PM
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 06, 2011 12:11AM
These are more his color: "Snow Balls"
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 06, 2011 12:20AM
Quote
plawrence
These are more his color: "Snow Balls"

Don't eat the pink snow.
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 06, 2011 02:50PM
Quote
plawrence
These are more his color: "Snow Balls"

Watch out where the Chick-ons go
Don't you eat that weird pink snow
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 06, 2011 05:20PM
You prefer yellow?

The Shrek ones were good. But like Coca-Cola, Classic recipe is preferred.
I'll have to look if I have a picture of the Shrek ones in the wilderness.



Chick-on is looking at you!
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 06, 2011 05:47PM
There's a _recipe_ for Hostess Twinkies[tm]?
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 07, 2011 12:41AM
Quote
ttilley

There's a _recipe_ for Hostess Twinkies[tm]?


Actually, Yes!

It was even featured on the Today Show last year (2010) in honor of the 80th Anniversary of the Twinkie®.

NBC Today Show: Make your own Twinkies at home

video: http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/38691866#38691866


And here's more detailed video instructions on how on how to make your own Twinkies:




And Todd Wilbur's Twinkie Recipe in written form. smiling smiley



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/07/2011 12:58AM by plawrence.
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 07, 2011 01:08AM
And for those who care to know -- yes, there's a recipe for homemade Cheetos® too.

Food.com: Homemade Cheetos®
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 07, 2011 07:27PM
If he faithfully reproduced the original product, then someone following his directions, and leaving the result in their closet for 15 years, will find a rancid rock-hard substance which nonetheless shows no outward signs of rot (proof I watched the video!).

So...

(I had thought of asking whether Twinkies(tm) are an industrial by-product along the lines of Vegemite(tm), which I've been assured by a native Australian is "mothers' milk" scraped from the bottom of a brewery vat. Assuming Fosters is bottom-fermenting.)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/07/2011 07:27PM by ttilley.
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 09, 2011 12:03PM
This thread brings to mind Bruce Willis biting into a thousand year old twinkie.
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 28, 2011 08:14PM
A friend made red velvet "twinkies" and ever since I've heard of the concept, I'm obsessed.
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 13, 2011 07:11PM
The standard ones are toxic enough.

It appears that bill-e-g has consumed so many of them that he has permanently gone over to the
DARK PINK SIDE
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 13, 2011 07:40PM
Quote
szalkowski
The standard ones are toxic enough.

It appears that bill-e-g has consumed so many of them that he has permanently gone over to the
DARK PINK SIDE

A little bird told me someone here modeled for this: http://www.ske-art.com/skestuff9/B0049GXXJQ
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 13, 2011 09:28PM
Quote
eeek
Quote
szalkowski
The standard ones are toxic enough.

It appears that bill-e-g has consumed so many of them that he has permanently gone over to the
DARK PINK SIDE

A little bird told me someone here modeled for this: http://www.ske-art.com/skestuff9/B0049GXXJQ


Yup.
See how dessicated he looked right before he morphed.
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 22, 2011 06:54AM
Since following the links in this thread I now have Amazon.com emailing me about their Hostess Twinkies prices. Yuck. Need to clean up my 'recent viewing' history.
vomit
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 22, 2011 07:27AM
Quote
ttilley
Since following the links in this thread I now have Amazon.com emailing me about their Hostess Twinkies prices. Yuck. Need to clean up my 'recent viewing' history.
vomit



You have been infected with The Curse of the Pink Chikin.
(SecurelyImmunizedly Yours)
The Marmots

P.S. Perhaps you should check to see if Amazon has any Chikin Voodoo Dolls.
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 22, 2011 08:48AM
This is your best bet:

avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 22, 2011 08:47AM
Here's another "what to put in your bear can" picture:
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 22, 2011 06:33PM
Quote
bill-e-g
Here's another "what to put in your bear can" picture:

Really? I thought you put one of these in a bear can.
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 22, 2011 06:32PM
Quote
ttilley
Since following the links in this thread I now have Amazon.com emailing me about their Hostess Twinkies prices. Yuck. Need to clean up my 'recent viewing' history.
vomit

Wouldn't it be easier to just turn off the Amazon suggestions emails?
avatar Re: Shouldn't they be doing a Chick-on edition?
June 22, 2011 06:58PM
They have too many 'options' to locate...

Thanks, that will help. The problem will still arise because, when I actually do want to buy something, they'll remind me of my deep and abiding interest in inedible packaged products (followed from links here), Sarah Palin's Whining (followed from recommending Jesus' General Reviews), and other rubbish. But one issue at a time, I guess.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login