Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Posts
Dogwood bloom in Yosemite Valley

The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (73% of Full)


Advanced

Re: ATT vs, Verizon in the Valley

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

ATT vs, Verizon in the Valley
August 28, 2009 03:42PM
Hi,
My wife's Verizon phone (Moto Razr) gets reception (mostly) in the valley. Now she needs a new phone and is considering the iPhone. Does anyone know about the ATT network in the valley? Any iPhone users out there care to comment?

Thanks, Dave
avatar Re: ATT vs, Verizon in the Valley
August 28, 2009 04:09PM
ATT worked for a friend recently. Seemed better than Verizon but that may have just been the phones.
avatar Re: ATT vs, Verizon in the Valley
August 28, 2009 04:36PM
There are three main ATT cell sites in the Park: Sentinel Dome, Tuolumne Meadows & Curry Villiage. They are all in fine working order 'cause Bee'sFrog keeps 'em that way! The coverage becomes spotty in the winter because snow and road closures keep the crews from maintaining the sites.

B
Re: ATT vs, Verizon in the Valley
August 28, 2009 04:50PM
Quote
Bee
There are three main ATT cell sites in the Park: Sentinel Dome, Tuolumne Meadows & Curry Villiage.

Are the CDMA (like Verizon) sites co-located with the GSM (ATT) sites?

It's very useful to know where the cell sites are when you are trying to find a working spot.

What about Mount Hoffman? Is that a cell site as well?
avatar Re: ATT vs, Verizon in the Valley
August 28, 2009 05:06PM
Quote
RobE
Are the CDMA (like Verizon) sites co-located with the GSM (ATT) sites?

I'd be surprised if they weren't.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login