I just read about this bill. I haven't been able to find what else is in it (although the name implies that the combination of provisions is more related to political wrangling rather than logic). On the surface, it sounds good for the NPS but I'm not sure. From the perspective of many of us on this list, the 6 new NPS "units" to be added seem more focussed on historical sites rather than wilderness locations so, at least for me, that makes it a bit less attention-grabbing (not to mention that something like a Manhattan Project Historical Site is likely to spark lots of political wrangling on its own). The article in the link above also mentions that the bill "includes provisions that could harm our natural resources." I don't know what those provisions are (although at least one of them seems to apply to "mineral rights" in the site area(s). The bill hasn't gone through the Senate yet so it could be radically altered by the time it's signed but it seems of some interest even in its current form.
Anybody know anything more about this?
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12/08/2014 05:26PM by DavidK42.